04 Jun LinkedIn Is Not a Recruiting Strategy
You’re a civil engineering leader.
You spent the entire day juggling client calls, proposals, project deadlines, staff issues, utilization, budgets, and trying to keep projects moving because your team is already stretched thin.
It is now 8:30 at night.
The kids are finally upstairs.
And now it is time to recruit, right?
I mean, your employees would not be at the office so late if you had the extra manpower. And part of your job is to grow your team.
So you open LinkedIn.
You run a few searches.
Maybe you send a connection request or two.
Maybe you even fire off a message.
Okay.
But then what?
Sending One LinkedIn Message Is Not Recruiting
What happens when the person does not accept your connection request?
What happens when they do accept it, but never respond to your message?
What happens when they saw it, thought about responding, got pulled into a client call, and then never came back to it?
Because sending one LinkedIn message is not recruiting.
That is one attempt.
And the reality is, most highly sought-after civil engineers are not sitting around checking LinkedIn all day.
Sorry, LinkedIn.
I have literally had people respond to me six months, or even twelve months later saying:
“Sorry Matt, I never check LinkedIn.”
And these are often very good candidates.
They are not ignoring opportunity because they are uninterested. They are busy. They are buried. They are managing projects, clients, staff, deadlines, and their actual lives.
So if LinkedIn does not work, then what?
Recruiting Requires More Than One Channel
If the LinkedIn message goes nowhere, are you going to keep going?
Are you going to find their personal email address?
Are you going to figure out the company email format and contact them at work?
Are you going to track down a cell phone number?
Are you going to call them?
Text them?
Follow up multiple times over weeks or months?
Stay organized while managing dozens or hundreds of outreach attempts at the same time?
Because that is recruiting.
And it is hard.
Really hard.
Most of the time, you get ignored, rejected, ghosted, or told no.
Then you wake up the next day and do it all over again.
Civil Engineering Recruiting Is a Full-Time Job
This is the part many firms underestimate.
Recruiting experienced civil engineers is not something most engineering leaders can realistically squeeze in between project management responsibilities.
Not consistently.
Not at the level required to compete for top talent.
You may be able to send a few messages at night. You may be able to search LinkedIn for a little while. You may even get lucky once in a while.
But recruiting is not really about one good search.
It is about process.
It is about persistence.
It is about knowing who to contact, how to reach them, when to follow up, what to say, how to position the opportunity, and how to keep the conversation moving.
It is also about timing.
The right candidate may not be ready today.
But they may be ready three months from now.
Or six months from now.
Or after a project wraps up.
Or after a bonus is paid.
Or after another long week where they realize they are tired of doing three jobs while getting paid for one.
Someone has to stay organized enough to keep that relationship alive.
Your Engineering Leaders Already Have Jobs
Most civil engineering leaders are not lacking effort.
They are already carrying a lot.
They are responsible for clients.
They are responsible for project delivery.
They are responsible for budgets.
They are responsible for mentoring staff.
They are responsible for utilization.
They are responsible for proposals.
They are responsible for quality.
They are responsible for growing the team.
And somewhere in there, they are also supposed to source, contact, follow up with, screen, sell, and close candidates?
That is a big ask.
Especially when the candidates they need are usually already employed, busy, and not actively looking.
The result is predictable.
Recruiting gets pushed to the edges of the day.
A few LinkedIn messages go out.
A few people do not respond.
The leader gets pulled back into project work.
Then another month goes by and the position is still open.
Meanwhile, the existing team gets more stretched, morale gets worse, and project delivery becomes harder.
That is how staffing problems compound.
Recruiting Requires Follow-Up
One of the biggest differences between casual outreach and real recruiting is follow-up.
A good candidate may need several touchpoints before responding.
That does not mean spamming them.
It means being professionally persistent.
Maybe the first message does not land.
Maybe the second gets seen but forgotten.
Maybe the third catches them on the right day.
Maybe a text works when LinkedIn did not.
Maybe a call gets through when email did not.
Maybe they are not ready now, but they are open to staying in touch.
That is normal.
But it requires a system.
It requires tracking.
It requires time.
It requires discipline.
And it requires someone who can keep doing it after the first few no-responses.
That is where a lot of internal recruiting efforts fall apart.
Not because the firm is bad.
Not because the opportunity is weak.
But because the process is inconsistent.
The Best Candidates Are Usually Not Easy to Reach
In civil engineering, the candidates firms want most are often the hardest to reach.
The strong Project Managers.
The Senior Engineers.
The future leaders.
The people who can manage clients, lead staff, deliver work, and make an immediate impact.
Those people are usually employed.
They are usually busy.
They are usually being contacted by other firms.
They may not be posting resumes.
They may not be checking job boards.
They may not be responding to every recruiter or hiring manager who messages them.
So the recruiting process has to be more thoughtful than “send message, wait, give up.”
It has to be multi-channel.
It has to be persistent.
It has to be organized.
And it has to be credible.
Let Engineers Do Engineering
The firms that understand this tend to move faster.
They hire better.
They protect their engineering leaders’ time.
They put their Project Managers, Department Heads, and Principals back in positions where they can actually focus on engineering, clients, staff, delivery, and growth.
That matters.
Because every hour a civil engineering leader spends trying to become a part-time recruiter is an hour not spent leading the team, serving clients, mentoring staff, reviewing work, or helping projects move forward.
There is a real opportunity cost there.
Recruiting is important.
But so is keeping your engineering leaders focused on the highest and best use of their time.
Final Thought
LinkedIn can be a useful tool.
But LinkedIn is not a recruiting strategy.
Sending one message is not recruiting.
Posting a job is not recruiting.
Hoping someone responds is not recruiting.
Real recruiting requires research, outreach, follow-up, organization, persistence, market knowledge, and the ability to keep going after being ignored far more often than anyone wants to admit.
That is why recruiting in civil engineering is a full-time job.
Not something most engineering leaders can realistically squeeze in after a full day of keeping projects afloat.
The firms that understand this tend to move faster, hire better, and keep their engineering leaders focused on what they do best.
They let their engineers do engineering.
And they leave the recruiting to recruiters.
:::
No Comments